i’ll admit — i am a bit of a coffee snob. as a seattle-to-d.c. transplant, i am the first among my friends to have an opinion about a coffee shop or a certain roast, and likely am not humble in expressing my opinion. however, a couple of weeks ago i was at a local coffee shop, and stumbled upon a new roast from a new coffee company in town called redeeming grounds. sitting by the bag of beans was a stack of palm cards that said “cutting cocaine for coffee.”

as coffee consumers, we rarely think about how sustainably our coffee is sourced or all that it takes to get from crop to cup. we may know whether or not it is fair trade, and where the beans are from (because it’s often advertised that way), but that’s about it.

a typical supply chain for coffee is as follows: the bean starts with the farmer. they grow and harvest the bean, and then it is sent off to one or maybe multiple cooperatives. from the cooperatives the bean goes to a central exporting collector, who then ships the coffee, an importer picks it up, and it is then taken in many cases to a fair trade certifier. then the bean goes to the commodity traders and hedgers, then to the industrial roaster, then to the labeler and sealer, and finally to the distributor that takes it to the store where you buy it.

at each point in the supply chain, the farmer loses money from his crop because money is going to each other cog in the supply chain. at many of these points, energy is also expended, contributing to further pollution.

redeeming grounds has significantly reduced all the points in the typical supply chain. they buy directly from the farmers, and the beans are shipped to them. they roast them in their own roasting facility, and label and package their coffee themselves. then it is distributed to you.

because redeeming grounds is a nonprofit, they give all their profit from the sale of the coffee directly to the farmers. with less cogs in the supply chain that suck money away from the farmers, and all the money from the sale of the coffee being funneled back to them, the farmers have a greater and more sustainable income that they can invest back into the community to build it up. and these communities do need to be built up, because they are riddled with the violence and destruction of guerrilla warfare.

as i sip from my coffee cup in the morning, i can know that not only are the beans i am drinking sustainably sourced and beyond fair trade, but they are also making a difference in the lives of farmers in colombia who are combating deforestation, guerrilla violence, and the cultivation and sale of cocaine. i may still be labeled a coffee snob, but at least i am now a snob with a cause.

at the tree house the pines whisper during the summer and are hushed in the winter when they are covered in snow. the waterfalls rage below glistening peaks, and i get to explore it all. but two summers ago a forest fire came within forty yards of my beloved family cabin, and i saw before me the prospect of the place where all of my treasured family memories were made being burned to the ground.

increased rainfall in the winters and decreased rainfall in the summers create drier summers with reduced stream flow west of the cascades. drier and warmer summers mean drier forests. snowpack in the mountains is low and snowmelt will occur three to four weeks earlier. in fact data that observed stream flow each year in june for the past fifty years shows that in the washington cascade region, stream flow has reduced 4 to 15 percent.

all of these factors make forests in the pacific northwest increasingly susceptible to forest fires. beyond the destruction of aesthetic beauty and recreation areas, as these trees that have stored carbon for years are burned they release all of the stored carbon back into the atmosphere, contributing further to our climate problem. also lost is the ecological service these trees give us by cleaning air and water.

forests in this region will also begin to see greater invasion of the pine beetle. these huge beetles invade increasingly warmer, drier regions, burrow into trees, and kill them from their trunk to their tip, making for patches of dead, dry trees.  however, the beetles won’t last long because they can only survive within a specific temperature range, and the cascade forests will soon be too hot, even for the pine beetles. their presence in the forests will decrease by about 50% by around 2100.

unfortunately, there is not much we can do for our forests. thinning the surfaces and canopies of our forests could abate some of the fire’s fury, but the reality is that persistent warming will simply continue to threaten the forests.

northwest recreational junkies, beware: though seattle, my hometown, is thought to be an epicenter of environmental friendliness and home to many-a-tree-hugger, it is far from being immune to the impacts of climate change. the northwestern corner of the united states not only faces forest vulnerabilities, but also water resource, coastline, and agricultural impacts.

this affects you, the hiker who’s favorite forest will be infested with pine beetles; you, the spring skier with no good snow come march at mt. bachelor; you, the paddle-boarder off of alki beach who’s favorite place to coast through the waters will look very different a few years down the road; and me, one who, like the rest of us in the pacific northwest, delights in the beauty of the snowy mountains and lush nature that surrounds our region that is undergoing change.