{"id":11133,"date":"2022-03-16t19:00:39","date_gmt":"2022-03-16t19:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dpetrov.2create.studio\/planet\/wordpress\/microplastics-the-3-forms-of-plastic-pollution-gw-profits-from\/"},"modified":"2022-03-16t19:00:39","modified_gmt":"2022-03-16t19:00:39","slug":"microplastics-the-3-forms-of-plastic-pollution-gw-profits-from","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.getitdoneaz.com\/story\/microplastics-the-3-forms-of-plastic-pollution-gw-profits-from\/","title":{"rendered":"microplastics: the 3 forms of plastic pollution gw profits from"},"content":{"rendered":"
do you have an appetite for plastic? ever crave some cling wrap as a late-night snack? research says you\u2019ve already eaten plenty. in 2019, the world wildlife fund shared that the average person ingests about 5 grams of plastic per week<\/a>, equivalent to one credit card. we aren\u2019t accidentally biting pieces off of our sporks; the plastic in our bloodstream actually comes from fragments of plastics in our produce and water. <\/p>\n microplastics are a form of microfibers \u2013\u2013 fibers under 5 mm in diameter or just a little larger than a headphone jack. over time, through washes and wears, our clothes\u2019 synthetic fibers like polyester, nylon, and spandex break down and release microplastics into our water systems or enter waste facilities and are then used as fertilizer and absorbed by our produce. the amount of microplastics released is significant. domestic washes alone contribute up to 35% of microfiber pollution<\/a> in the atmosphere. this is a concern because of how pervasive microplastics are. they\u2019ve been found in our drinking water<\/a>, in produce such as apples<\/a>, in markets across the us selling seafood<\/a>, and even in pregnant women\u2019s placentas<\/a>. institutions like universities however are more focused on getting rid of visible plastic waste and are neglecting to prevent this major form of pollution now found even in the deepest parts<\/a> of the oceans. <\/p>\n in an effort to curb the amount of unnecessary plastic waste the school creates, the george washington university administration issued a single-use plastics ban<\/a> in the spring of 2021. the decision has the expected (and debatably impactful) restrictions on plastic utensils and bottles at university events but fails to regulate another significant source of plastic pollution that it\u2019s profiting from: synthetic fibers. it is encouraging to see the university switch from synthetic plastics to bioplastics in their kitchenware, but there needs to be a massive change in the school store as well. to begin, here are three suggested edits for the school\u2019s online and in-person store. <\/p>\n out of the 70 designs offered for women\u2019s sweatshirts on gw\u2019s bookstore site, only two sweatshirts are fully made from natural fibers, both being cotton crewnecks. the remaining 70 sweatshirts are between 20-100% polyester. the sweatshirts that are fully fleece are of major concern. researchers found that, on average, synthetic fleece jackets release 1.7 grams of microfibers each wash<\/a>, which is the mass of about two pen caps. additionally, out of the ten beanies offered, only one was fully made with cotton; the rest were 100% acrylic.<\/p>\n solution: since two sweaters are already made from 100% cotton, gw can reduce its stock of microplastics-shedding sweaters and offer more designs with primarily natural fibers. <\/p>\n1. no more synthetic knitwear<\/a> <\/h2>\n