austin monthly<\/a> in 2018, \u201cthere\u2019s just too many variables.\u201d herpetologists have devised countless doomsday scenarios \u2014 each worse than the next. the oil pipelines that stretch across the area\u2019s recharge zone could crack. a pathogen could infect the water table. a sewage line could bust. a drought could de-water the aquifer. the city of austin does have development regulations, but that doesn\u2019t stop construction in the suburbs. local protections can\u2019t halt the threats of climate change leading to bigger droughts, and the omnipresent threat of a chemical spill that could wipe out the species faster than biologists could save them. \u201cto date,\u201d glustenkamp said, \u201cthere’s no way to remove any of those threats once they appear.\u201d<\/p>\neven if the aquifer were to become restored, the question remains, in the words of fenolio: \u201chow do you put a salamander back into an aquifer?\u201d fenolio knows of no successful reintroductions of salamanders to a groundwater system \u2014 nor of any attempts to reintroduce the species. chamberlain believes that it might take years of releasing salamanders and monitoring the population\u2019s response before reintroduction is successful. glusenkamp is not so optimistic. \u201cit’s very difficult to put a three-inch salamander back in the springs without it washing out,\u201d he said. \u201cdo i think that we’re gonna be able to t-shirt cannon salamanders back to their habitat and we’re gonna restore species after extinction events? no.\u201d<\/p>\n
if the wild salamanders were to be wiped out, the captive salamanders would not be alone on the metaphorical ark. they would join the ranks of other species with the distinct red class listing of \u201cextinct in the wild,\u201d or ew \u2014 from the sky-blue spix’s macaw to the regal south china tiger to the acid-yellow panamanian golden frog \u2014 species that don\u2019t exist in the wild anymore, but instead live a captive half-life. this is the \u201cvery core of one of the key and critical problems with conservation biology,\u201d fenolio said. \u201cwhat do you call it when you have a species in captivity… their habitat is gone in the wild, (and) you can’t put them back anywhere? is it conservation anymore, or is it curation?\u201d<\/p>\n(eva legge\/dartmouth college)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nthis beckons the question: should we reintroduce the species, if it goes extinct? if the aquifer remains polluted, should humans step in and try to salvage it? fenolio suggested that one may be able to inject medical-grade de-activated carbon into the water which tends to bond and sequester contaminants, but that may not be effective, and may do more harm than good. in that case, does one play god and find a new home for the species, risking the introduction of a new pathogen, or of another australian cane toad catastrophe? do we leave the salamanders in captivity for perhaps hundreds of years until a \u201ca \u201cbiblical flood,\u201d as glusenkamp puts it, refills the aquifer with clean water? this brings to mind john mcphee\u2019s remark in his book, “the control of nature” (and echoed by elizabeth kolbert in “under a white sky”) on how the rerouting of the mississippi in the eisenhower era \u201cwill come to mind more or less in echo of any struggle against natural forces \u2014 heroic or venal, rash or well-advised \u2014 when human beings conscript themselves to fight against the earth.\u201d would injecting de-activated carbon, and t-shirt-cannoning captive raised species into this fragile environment be a trespass over our role as humans, “to surround the base of mount olympus demanding and expecting the surrender of gods?\u201d or is it our unique duty to do just that?<\/p>\n
\u201ci think everybody involved in this would agree, (reintroduction) is the last tool you want to use,\u201d glustenkamp said. \u201cabsolutely the last tool. and it’s incumbent on all of us to do everything we can to avoid using that tool, by taking other actions.\u201d thankfully, there are many who continue to steward the aquifer and its inhabitants. documentary filmmakers educate the public<\/a> about the beauty and fragility of barton springs. the lawyers at the save our springs alliance<\/a> hold local governments and developers accountable to clean water regulations. and the scientists at the city of austin who work to monitor wild populations and restore degraded habitat \u2014 those who grapple necessary truth that one day the wild salamanders may be gone \u2014 who cradle their black-spotted heads and watch oxygen diffuse through their gills \u2014 may be the species\u2019 fiercest advocates. \u201clast time i checked, two-inch long blind salamanders made of jelly aren’t very good boxers,\u201d glustenkamp said. but austin\u2019s scientists have their gloves on, ready to go to the mat on this one. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"in the heart of austin, texas, lies a salamander sanctuary that exists as a backup, in case the wild population were to be wiped out \u2014 but is it enough to save the species?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10011,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5196],"tags":[506,144,262,826,3961,591],"storyfest_categories":[],"class_list":["post-11302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-past-storyfest","tag-biodiversity","tag-climate-change","tag-conservation","tag-endangered-species","tag-native-species","tag-storyfest"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
the salamanders at the end of the world - planet forward<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n