{"id":11351,"date":"2021-03-01t06:07:00","date_gmt":"2021-03-01t06:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dpetrov.2create.studio\/planet\/wordpress\/understanding-the-invisible-air-quality-and-health\/"},"modified":"2023-02-28t18:37:23","modified_gmt":"2023-02-28t18:37:23","slug":"invisible-health-air-quality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.getitdoneaz.com\/story\/invisible-health-air-quality\/","title":{"rendered":"understanding the invisible: air quality and health"},"content":{"rendered":"
fort collins, colorado, residents are used to spending time outside. it\u2019s inherently a \u201ccolorado\u201d thing\u2014hiking across foothills, skiing down snowcapped peaks, spending a great deal of time in nature\u2014it\u2019s what coloradoans do.<\/em> these healthy exercise habits increase brain function, boost metabolism, and make us feel good. but there\u2019s a downside to spending time outdoors when the air is thick with microscopic pollution particles. as the greater mountain west region rebounds from a catastrophic and historic season of wildfires, environmental health scientists urge everyone from recreators to professional athletes to pay attention to their local air quality\u2014out of concern that these healthy habits<\/em> could directly harm your health.<\/p>\n 2020 has taught us that some of our deepest problems are the ones we can\u2019t see. through interdisciplinary efforts on behalf of the center for science communication (csc) at colorado state university, we\u2019ve begun to understand how we can protect ourselves from one of those invisible issues.<\/p>\n the up-and-coming center, housed in the greater department of journalism and media communication, has goals, action plans, and tools in place to combat these issues, just as the following studies portray. it\u2019s truly revolutionary, in that such an assortment of individuals can unite efforts to better understand an aspect of our world. the csc seeks to connect stakeholders across campus in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities to improve the science communication process. it\u2019s a stimulating democratic approach\u2014the csc; a center for the people, by the people<\/em>\u2014to science, which will pay dividends to research for years to come.<\/p>\n enter zoey rosen, the dark-haired and bright-eyed scholar, who holds a bachelor\u2019s degree in atmospheric science (a unique combination of meteorology and physics), and a master\u2019s degree in public communication and technology from colorado state university. she is currently in year two of her ph.d. in public communication and technology, with a focus on weather. rosen is part of the social-science side of the equation to the csc\u2019s overall mission of effectively increasing awareness of science\u2014communicating to general audiences how air-quality research is important through a nasa-funded program: the citizen-enabled aerosol measurements for satellites (ceams) project. headed by john volckens, mechanical engineering professor and principal investigator, the ceams team combines diverse academic backgrounds to tackle issues of air quality.<\/p>\n \u201cceams is a citizen-science project,\u201d says rosen. \u201cwe are trying to see if the act of measuring air quality influences how we understand and think about the air from a day-to-day standpoint.\u201d<\/p>\n according to the ceams blog<\/a>, which has been managed by rosen along with other ceams researchers, citizen science is the collaborative effort wherein volunteers help researchers collect scientific data. in many ways, citizen-science captures the goals of the csc: bringing together academic experts, industry professionals, staff, students, and citizens to better coordinate science communication. scientists at csu have designed a machine that is sent to volunteers for setup in their backyards, dubbed the amod (aerosol mass and optical depth) sampler. see the diagram below for more information.<\/p>\n why and how is ceams analyzing this data? carefully, jokes rosen. \u201cwe study how the air-quality measurements change over time, compare measurements at different locations, and assess how the existence of different types of particles can impact our health,\u201d rosen said.<\/p>\n rosen illustrates how this can be tricky. imagine when you were an elementary student, playing with magnets in science class. you might have been amazed when paperclips rapidly stuck to the poles, or transfixed by how two equal polar ends of magnets would simply refuse to connect. that<\/em> science was understandable, tangible\u2026visible!<\/p>\n \u201ccan we apply that same sort of hands-on learning to adults in communities? that\u2019s what we\u2019re trying to do,\u201d rosen said. \u201cbecause most of the time, we can\u2019t see if the air quality bad or not. we have no concept of how this actually affects us\u2014it\u2019s just air!<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\n when i see snow outside, my instincts tell me to tread lightly; i don\u2019t want to slip. but i can\u2019t see air, so how am i supposed to know when it\u2019s bad? <\/em>according to the world health organization, air pollution is one of the leading causes of death across the globe. it worsens underlying cardiovascular and respiratory problems and has a host of short-term exposure effects when exacerbated by events like wildfires. according to the epa, the overall health effects from pollution lay on a spectrum, where the least significant effects are associated with large particle exposure for a minimal amount of time, and the direst effects are jointly associated with fine particles and longer exposures. this spectrum consists of relatively minor coughing and phlegm build-up effects, to bronchitis and asthma, finally progressing to heart failure, stroke, and premature death.<\/p>\n these statistics are courtesy of the world health organization.<\/p>\n rosen explains how the importance of incorporating social sciences\u2014or the human element<\/em>, as she calls it\u2014is extremely important in making sure that society understands an issue in science. increased engagement with amod devices not only provides feedback about air-quality across the nation, but indicates a profound devotion to science. <\/p>\n \u201cwe ask questions at periodic stages throughout the deployment. if you\u2019re measuring air quality for 8-10 weeks, then we give you a questionnaire before you start, one about 4 or 5 weeks in, and then one when you\u2019re done and send your machine back,\u201d says rosen.<\/p>\n anthropomorphizing<\/em>\u2014or \u2018humanizing\u2019\u2014the situation itself has provided more opportunity for social science to analyze public motivations to contribute.<\/p>\n \u201cwe\u2019ve found that participants get kind of connected to their boxes\u201d (the amod devices). \u201cwhen these boxes don\u2019t work, it bothers them deeply,\u201d chuckled marilee long, co-investigator within the ceams study, and health and science communication expert for the csc. \u201cin fact, zoey and i are studying how citizens anthropomorphize the box.\u201d<\/p>\n long and rosen are interested in assigning names, interaction opportunities, and even \u2018wake-up-procedures\u2019 into these amod boxes\u2014altogether creating a more human experience for volunteers. imagine your amod-upgraded morning routine: you brush your teeth, eat a bowl of cereal, and get ready for work, as paul<\/em>, your friendly patio amod, concisely tells you all the pertinent information about the air. long predicts that this human element would promote a huge uptick in motivation to learn, to record data findings, and altogether understand air quality.<\/p>\n but ceams\u2019 efforts aren\u2019t alone in these studies; long and ashley anderson, both members of the csc and instructors within the jmc department, join this broad effort to teach, strategize, and improve the science communication process through a multitude of studies.<\/p>\n \u201csocial science is really hard to do well, because people are complex,\u201d long paused, acknowledging the tricky power in that complexity. \u201cit\u2019s challenging to get people to give you their unadulterated thoughts. but when they do, it not only improves our understanding of a study\u2014it motivates those citizen-sciences to want to learn more.<\/em>\u201d<\/p>\nhow can we know if it\u2019s safe to breathe the very air that surrounds us?<\/h2>\n
\n\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200b\u200bgraduate teaching assistant<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nwhat we can\u2019t see can hurt us<\/h2>\n
\n
‘if people don\u2019t understand, then what\u2019s the point of your science?’<\/h2>\n
the csc: highlighting the importance of social science<\/h2>\n