{"id":11580,"date":"2020-02-06t17:01:18","date_gmt":"2020-02-06t17:01:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dpetrov.2create.studio\/planet\/wordpress\/the-bhutanese-approach-to-carbon-neutrality-and-negativity\/"},"modified":"2020-02-06t17:01:18","modified_gmt":"2020-02-06t17:01:18","slug":"bhutanese-carbon-neutrality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.getitdoneaz.com\/story\/bhutanese-carbon-neutrality\/","title":{"rendered":"the bhutanese approach to carbon neutrality (and negativity)"},"content":{"rendered":"
the kingdom of bhutan has attempted to get the world\u2019s attention for years, but not many listened until the paris agreement. they wrote off the tiny himalayan, landlocked state as irrelevant, even though the carbon emissions reduction model brought about carbon-neutrality, a nation that has offset its own carbon emissions, and eventually carbon-negativity, a nation that diminishes greenhouse gases already built up in the atmosphere itself. <\/p>\n
the nation was able to achieve carbon-negative status through four steps: establishing a gross national happiness (gnh) index; creating a unique approach to sustainability; developing a strong environmental governance and policy; encouraging a diversification of the national economy. <\/p>\n
in a world that has become more interconnected and polarized simultaneously due to globalization, it is important to observe these bhutanese initiatives individually. first, and most significantly, is the unique way in which the nation tracks productivity: their gross national happiness.<\/p>\n
the \u201cgross national happiness index,\u201d or gnh, is the measurement of the collective happiness in a nation. the concept entails a holistic approach toward economic progress while also asserting equal importance to non-economic indicators of development. essentially, the gnh is an alternative form of measuring national productivity to gross domestic product (gdp). <\/p>\n
despite the bhutanese government\u2019s use of gnh as a main productivity factor, the government still holds productivity and economic success in high regard. however, the concept of gross national happiness set the precedent for environmental and conservation policy in bhutan. <\/p>\n
former prime minister of bhutan tshering tobgay conveys this sentiment in his 2014 ted talk<\/a> when he admits that \u201ceconomic growth is important, but that economic growth must not come from undermining our unique culture or our pristine environment.\u201d<\/p>\n so how does the gnh index actually work? the concept of gross national happiness can be broken down into four pillars: good governance, sustainable and socio-economic development, cultural preservation, and environmental conservation.<\/p>\n good governance is how fair and responsible the government, both federal and local, is in leading the people of bhutan.<\/p>\n sustainable and socio-economic development is the process by which businesses and the well being of people improve over time. <\/p>\n cultural preservation is the maintenance of buddhist values and traditions through government-sponsored initiatives. <\/p>\n environmental conservation is how well bhutan\u2019s forests, mountains, and wild-life reservations are protected through government and business policy. <\/p>\n as of 2015 and the third iteration of this index, 43.4 percent of bhutanese are deeply or extremely happy and 91.2 percent of the people are sufficient in five or more of the domains. <\/p>\n but how did this rapid increase in personal happiness come to be in just five years? <\/p>\n environmental policy is encouraged and deeply rooted in the gnh concept. after all, one of the four pillars of gnh is environmental conservation. additionally, one of the nine domains in evaluating happiness is ecological diversity and resilience. <\/p>\n a history of ethnic tensions between the buddhist, bhutanese majority and nepali minority have prompted questions about the gnh model. despite the controversy surrounding particular government decisions, it does not compromise the concept of gross national happiness today because controversy is measured on a number of indicators that safeguard any type of prejudice, be it along spiritual, religious, or ethnic lines.<\/p>\n in summation, gross national happiness is an effective socio-economic model because it provides public insight into policy. polling gathered from gnh indices encourages government institutions like the national environmental commission to pass environmental laws, all of which contributes to bhutan\u2019s carbon-negative status. additionally, the indexes provided insight into potential sustainable development projects that could benefit bhutanese citizens struggling to find jobs. <\/p>\n <\/p>\n sustainable development is economic development that does not compromise the current and future populations of a nation. this balance can be difficult to maintain when there are various interest groups that will endorse policy beneficial to their own agendas. for example, the american oil and natural gas lobby and the natural resource defense council (nrdc) will speak in the house of representatives to promote their own interests. in bhutan, there are various influences and contrasting opinions that have resulted in meaningful policy writing \u2014 but that will likely be swept under the rug, so to speak. <\/p>\n in an article titled “bhutan: a review of its approach to sustainable development,<\/a>” bob frame writes that \u201cthe strong, centralized, government-led agenda (rather than a donor-driven one) provides a secure sense of national cohesion on policy issues and one that donors respect and use as an example of good practice.\u201d <\/p>\n this allegation is easily justifiable. a government that entertains deals or treaties with foreign businesses and governments may be more susceptible to outside influence in domestic affairs. these international entanglements have led to conflict in the past. <\/p>\n as frame puts it: \u201cbhutan has been careful to maximise the benefits of its ‘brand image’ internationally and to reduce the impact of mitigating factors. as a result it maintains, for now, its reputation as a ‘shangri-la’ destination for tourism and for development, with the likelihood that this will continue to ensure a steady flow of donor and private-sector (including academic and student exchange) funds for some time to come.\u201d <\/p>\n instead, the bhutanese government centers its focus for sustainability investments into national programs and forge deals with particular nations in support of the aforementioned programs. <\/p>\n2. sustainable development <\/strong><\/h2>\n