{"id":11804,"date":"2019-07-19t05:15:24","date_gmt":"2019-07-19t05:15:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dpetrov.2create.studio\/planet\/wordpress\/congress-may-still-seek-new-home-for-nations-nuclear-waste\/"},"modified":"2023-02-28t18:36:58","modified_gmt":"2023-02-28t18:36:58","slug":"nuclear-waste-disposal-limbo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.getitdoneaz.com\/story\/nuclear-waste-disposal-limbo\/","title":{"rendered":"congress may still seek new home for nation\u2019s nuclear waste"},"content":{"rendered":"
by kimberly jin<\/strong><\/p>\n washington \u2013 thirty-seven years ago, congress decided the federal government should be responsible for disposing of the waste from the nation\u2019s nuclear power plants. but the waste still is being stored at the plants today.<\/p>\n several leading senators want the federal government to step up to its commitment by switching from the permanent repository site that had been proposed \u2013 yucca mountain in nevada \u2013 and put the nation\u2019s 80,000 metric tons of spent fuel into several centralized interim storages. experts say the proposal would save millions of dollars without compromising safety. but the local opposition that eventually doomed the yucca mountain site is likely to occur at any interim sites.<\/p>\n economics of nuclear waste<\/strong><\/p>\n a small parking lot sits by the shore of the back river in bailey point peninsula, maine. sixty-four white concrete casks, each one 26 feet high, stand in lines on the lot. they are the storage system for the spent nuclear fuel \u2013 the only reminder of the maine yankee nuclear power plant, which completed its decommissioning in 2005 and demolished.<\/p>\n the lot is approximately 11 acres, a minuscule share of the former 800-acre plant site, but the federal government has spent $176.5 million since 1998 to maintain the storage system, and the cost is growing by $10 million every year, according to eric howes, spokesman for the yankee companies, which include maine yankee and another two decommissioned yankee nuclear power plants in massachusetts and connecticut.<\/p>\n \u201cthe only reason we\u2019re still in business is because the federal government has yet to remove the spent fuel,\u201d howes said.<\/p>\n maine yankee is one of the 80 plants across the country that store spent nuclear fuel onsite. seventeen are shuttered plants like maine yankee, while others are still in operation. onsite storage of spent fuel is an expensive process. it requires 24\/7 security and periodical monitoring to make sure the chemicals inside the casks are in good condition; the companies have successfully sued the federal government to cover the storage costs.<\/p>\n a 1982 law decided it\u2019s the federal government, not private companies, that is responsible for disposing the nuclear waste, and congress in 1987 designated yucca mountain as the single central point for storage. it was to be operational by 1998. two decades have passed, and paying for the waste storage to 80 sites has cost the federal government $7 billion.<\/p>\n \u201cthe real crime here is what is happening to the taxpayers,\u201d said rodney mccullum, senior director of fuel and decommissioning at the nuclear energy institute, a nuclear power advocacy organization funded by the nuclear industry. \u201ca tremendous amount of infrastructure goes into keeping these casks safe and the taxpayers are paying for every penny of it.\u201d<\/p>\n for communities where the closed plants are located, the economic damage has included the lost tax revenue from the plant and the difficulty in repurposing the land.<\/p>\n wiscasset, the town hosting maine yankee, collected $700,000 in taxes from the plant last year, a drop from $12 million when it was operating. although many of those plants \u2013like maine yankee \u2013have hundreds of acres of vacant land, it is very difficult to get new businesses to locate on the land.<\/p>\n \u201cthe land is basically useless as long as the spent fuel is sitting there,\u201d mccullum said. \u201ctechnically, i can tell you i could build a luxury condominium right next to those used fuel and it would be perfectly safe. but that\u2019s not how real estate works.\u201d<\/p>\n to remove the spent fuel, the original plan was to build a permanent repository in yucca mountain, nevada. but although the site was designated by congress in 1987 and around $15 billion was spent on evaluating and developing the site, the plan stalled in 2009 after strong opposition from nevada politicians.<\/p>\nthe new plan<\/h2>\n