{"id":11993,"date":"2019-02-21t13:10:23","date_gmt":"2019-02-21t13:10:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dpetrov.2create.studio\/planet\/wordpress\/a-photographers-challenge-communicating-complex-science-stories\/"},"modified":"2023-02-28t18:36:18","modified_gmt":"2023-02-28t18:36:18","slug":"science-stories-photographer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.getitdoneaz.com\/story\/science-stories-photographer\/","title":{"rendered":"a photographer\u2019s challenge: communicating complex science stories"},"content":{"rendered":"
anand varma is a science photographer and national geographic explorer. he studied biology as an undergrad at university of california, berkeley, but then found that photography allowed him to explore the natural world and learn about biology in a more flexible way. more recently, his focus has been on parasites, and his talk \u201cbeauty and the bizarre\u201d showcases the intricacies of parasitic interactions. i sat down and talked to him about what\u2019s next.<\/p>\n
q: many people cringe at the idea of parasitic insects. what is it about parasites that interest you so much?<\/strong><\/p>\n a: i think what i find so interesting about parasites is the fact that they challenge my assumptions about how the natural world works. i learned about biology, i learned about all these kinds of ecological interactions; predator and prey, and how animals evolve, defenses against predation, or competition. all of that sort of fits into a framework of how i understand the world. and these parasites come along and then give examples of things that don\u2019t really fit that framework, and all of a sudden i realized wait a minute, the level of complexity that\u2019s possible in nature is far beyond what i thought was possible. it\u2019s not like i thought i knew everything about nature ahead of time. but you feel confident in saying \u2018yeah, i see this hawk chasing after a squirrel. that fits into what i know of how the world works.\u2019 and then you read or hear about how these parasites are manipulating their host, and you think that makes no sense. and i found that really interesting. it\u2019s so novel; it\u2019s so interesting to me.<\/p>\n q: how do you think photography can be used as a form of environmental communication and why might this be more effective than, say, a scientific paper?<\/strong><\/p>\n a: photography has this advantage because we are very much visually oriented creatures. so much of our biology is based around the fact that we have such good vision. i think our brains are already well-built to take in imagery; it\u2019s automatically stimulating for us. so, you sort of have this built-in advantage. in that sense, i think it takes a lot less effort to grab somebody\u2019s attention. now, when it comes to changing somebody\u2019s worldview, and inspiring their curiosity, and all those things, it takes more than just the image to do that. it takes a story, it takes context, and a better understanding of what your audience\u2019s assumptions are. a photograph by itself can\u2019t do all that, but it\u2019s an amazing way into somebody\u2019s attention. i didn\u2019t really recognize that until i was having a conversation with my editor over that story, and he really defined my objective for that story. like, you\u2019re not going to teach everybody about every step of this process. the magazine is only going to give you one page, one photograph. and your job is to get people to stop flipping through the magazine and read the caption. and i\u2019ve really seen that as what the role of photography is more broadly. you can\u2019t necessarily give somebody an entire biology lesson with a single photograph. but you can get them to be at least interested to learn about it on their own, or to listen to you talk, or to read the paper or read the article. i just think it\u2019s this window into a larger subject.<\/p>\n q: in your talk \u201cbeauty and the bizarre,\u201d you talk about photographing the emerald wasp. could you talk a bit about their relationship with cockroaches and the possible relation to parkinson\u2019s disease? what exactly does the emerald wasp do?<\/strong><\/p>\n a: the emerald cockroach wasp, or the emerald jewel wasp (another common name it\u2019s known by) hunts cockroaches. but these cockroaches are larger than it, like many times. so rather than try to overpower it or kill the cockroach, it has figured out a way to immobilize its prey. it does that by leading its stinger into the back of the cockroach\u2019s head. its stinger has special sensors that can actually detect where in the brain its stinger is, and it finds the part of the brain that is responsible for the motivation for movement in the cockroach. it then injects a venom cocktail that disrupts the dopamine activity of that part of the brain. and that\u2019s a general way of describing a process that\u2019s actually more complex than i understand. i know that it involves something that disrupts the dopamine activity. what that means is this cockroach can still move, but it can no longer decide to move on its own. so the wasp removes its stinger, and then it grabs the cockroach by an antenna, and by pulling on the antenna, that stimulates the cockroach to move. but if it lets go of the antenna, the cockroach can\u2019t run away. so it\u2019s this way of getting around the fact that its prey is too large. but it also doesn\u2019t want to kill the prey because it\u2019s not going to eat it itself, it\u2019s going to actually feed it to its babies. it\u2019s going to bury it alive with a single egg that can feed on this living cockroach that stays fresh, because it\u2019s not dead.<\/p>\n