{"id":12383,"date":"2018-02-27t13:35:25","date_gmt":"2018-02-27t13:35:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dpetrov.2create.studio\/planet\/wordpress\/do-we-need-sustainability-labels-on-food-products\/"},"modified":"2023-02-28t18:35:54","modified_gmt":"2023-02-28t18:35:54","slug":"sustainability-labeling-on-food-products","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.getitdoneaz.com\/story\/sustainability-labeling-on-food-products\/","title":{"rendered":"do we need sustainability labels on food products?"},"content":{"rendered":"
the food system emits up to one-third<\/a> of global greenhouse gas emissions. between cultivation, processing, shipping, storing, and disposal, food production is a climate-costly part of modern society. many believe that limiting the carbon emissions produced by the food system is paramount in limiting climate change. <\/p>\n but how, exactly, to go about slashing food production emissions is unclear to the average consumer. many consumers want to know how to reduce their carbon footprints while shopping to feed themselves. <\/p>\n adding a sustainability label to food products is among the proposed methodology for reducing greenhouse gas emissions created by the food system. similar to a nutrition label, developing a comprehensive labeling system could not only help streamline the process for manufacturers, but could also help consumers make sense of how their food choices impact the environment. <\/p>\n presently, there is a fair amount of consumer confusion around health and sustainability labels like \u2018organic,\u2019 \u2018fair-trade\u2019 and \u2018locally produced.\u2019 an easy-to-read label would offer the every-increasing volume of eco-conscious consumers to quickly compare the sustainability of the food products within and across groups. <\/p>\n so why haven\u2019t we we created such labels already? well, some companies have, and it turns out, creating them is quite the challenge. <\/p>\n presently, the food industry lacks a comprehensive analysis system to accurately measure the effect of a food item has on the planet. though some metrics do exist, they typically focus on a singular element, like carbon emissions. but there\u2019s more to a food product than its carbon footprint: water use, land use, nitrogen released, energy required to cultivate, process, package, and transport foods, as well as emissions and materials associated with packaging and food lost in production. moreover, chemicals (including pesticides and hormones) used in production can have varied impacts on the environment. and none of these captures the footprint created by the enormous amount of food wasted every day by consumers and dining establishments.<\/p>\n such a multi-factorial measurement is perhaps why no such label yet exists. the road to sustainability food labeling is a long one, requiring many metrics to capture the various contributions. to complicate things further, certain foods may be more carbon-costly yet less water-intensive than others. and as of now, the scientific community does not have a consensus on how to precisely integrate some of the variables.<\/p>\n the supermarket chain tesco attempted a carbon labeling system in 2007<\/a>. originally, they pledged to put labels on all of their 70,000+ products to help shoppers compare carbon costs across products. just 5 years later, the grocer dropped the initiative, citing the monumental amount of work involved in the measure as their reason for abandoning the project. <\/p>\n and in 2008, the u.k. government introduced a voluntary scheme to encourage food manufacturers to add carbon footprint information on food product labels. studies found <\/a>that customers found it confusing to compare different brands and metrics, presenting a window of opportunity for labels to make comparison less difficult. <\/p>\n unfortunately, tesco, assumed other major grocers would hop on board with the initiative and give it critical mass essential to make headgeway. when that never happened, they dropped the program, citing \u201ca minimum of several months\u2019 work to calculate the footprint of each product<\/a>,\u201d and was able to only produce about 125 carbon labels a year. keep in mind that carbon is only one of several factors that make up the sustainability measure, and does not include nitrogen, water, and other variables mentioned above.<\/p>\nis a sustainability label the answer?<\/h2>\n
what\u2019s been done so far<\/h2>\n