{"id":12471,"date":"2017-08-07t12:54:00","date_gmt":"2017-08-07t12:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dpetrov.2create.studio\/planet\/wordpress\/how-to-construct-new-buildings-and-not-destroy-the-planet\/"},"modified":"2017-08-07t12:54:00","modified_gmt":"2017-08-07t12:54:00","slug":"how-to-construct-new-buildings-and-not-destroy-the-planet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.getitdoneaz.com\/story\/how-to-construct-new-buildings-and-not-destroy-the-planet\/","title":{"rendered":"how to construct new buildings \u2014\u00a0and not destroy the planet\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"
the construction industry exists at an interesting crossroads when it comes to sustainability. when you visualize construction, once you get past the stock photos of men in hard hats, the images you conjure might not have strong ties to the everyday idea of being environmentally friendly.<\/p>\n
maybe you envision immense concrete blocks obscuring the skyline, or smoke stacks pumping out pollution or a quiet patch of land made barren in preparation for the next biggest development seen this side of the mississippi. <\/p>\n
if you recall early mornings waking up to the sounds of jackhammers, or detour signs lengthening your route to work, it certainly doesn\u2019t improve your quality of life. this is something today\u2019s sustainable development goals strive to do.<\/p>\n
these mental manifestations of the construction industry aren\u2019t entirely representative of reality, however, they can\u2019t be written off as generalizations either. there are facts. the production of concrete, an extremely favorable building material, especially in dc, has contributed up to 5% of the world\u2019s carbon dioxide emissions in previous years. the u.s. green building council<\/a> (usgbc) has reported that buildings account for more than 40% of the u.s.\u2019s energy consumption.<\/p>\n as i have gone through three years of education and summer internships to prepare me for a post-graduate career in construction engineering i\u2019ve had to consider these things and weigh them against my goals. thankfully, the industry is more than just those statistics; it is adapting to the standards we \u2013 as wiser inhabitants of earth \u2013 are setting. one of the biggest ways the construction industry is moving forward, with me happily following along, is with leed<\/a>, or leadership in environmental and energy design.<\/p>\n first introduced in 1998 by the usgbc, leed started as a rating system with five simple categories to help promote conservation. it has progressed, offering the leed green associate credential (people are leed accredited, buildings are leed certified) to professionals who work in related industries. it has now even fostered its own sort of brand; often leed-certified buildings can be recognized by their use of glass, open spaces, inventive design, and natural elements. this has certainly helped improve the public conception of construction.<\/p>\n through my internship at clark construction this summer i\u2019ve spent some time learning more about how leed works in the favor of construction. though these buildings do save money and energy during their lifespan and are highly photogenic, there\u2019s a larger element. a lot of the credits come into play during construction and are earned by the general contractor. there are goals for reducing light pollution on a site, goals for reducing the amount of heat reflected, goals for picking sites that are easily accessible by public transportation. almost every aspect of the process, from selecting where your lumber comes from to picking the paint on your roof, can create a positive effect.<\/p>\n though i\u2019m learning more about smart ways to conserve and sustainable construction practices at clark, i still have some concerns about the future of keeping engineering green. firstly, the buildings that tend to be leed certified are large, and as i like to think, \u201cglamorous.\u201d projects like museums and skyscrapers, and massive residential buildings. sustainability doesn\u2019t seem as accessible for the less attractive and lower budget projects.<\/p>\n