{"id":12627,"date":"2017-02-28t17:08:16","date_gmt":"2017-02-28t17:08:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dpetrov.2create.studio\/planet\/wordpress\/syracuse-is-saving-the-rain\/"},"modified":"2017-02-28t17:08:16","modified_gmt":"2017-02-28t17:08:16","slug":"syracuse-is-saving-the-rain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.getitdoneaz.com\/story\/syracuse-is-saving-the-rain\/","title":{"rendered":"syracuse is ‘saving the rain’"},"content":{"rendered":"
the northern two thirds of onondaga lake were deemed suitable for swimming in a 2015 report by upstate freshwater institute. for the 4.6-square mile body of water bordering on the post-industrial city of syracuse, n.y. \u2014 which some have casually dubbed \u201cthe most polluted lake in america\u201d \u2014 this is no small feat.<\/p>\n
the watershed\u2019s recovery in recent years is largely thanks to save the rain, a unique stormwater management program initiated in 2009 by onondaga county executive joanne \u201cjoanie\u201d mahoney. by combining green solutions and community engagement with traditional water treatment methods, save the rain has put syracuse on the cutting edge of a growing movement of environmentally conscious water management across the nation.<\/p>\n
during syracuse\u2019s industrial-era development, onondaga lake was hit with a double blow, becoming a dumping ground for industrial chemical waste as well as sewage from the city. this traditional sacred site for the onondaga nation and 19th century tourist attraction was declared unfit for swimming by 1940, and fishing was banned in 1972. even after industrial dumping was halted, the problem of sewage remained; it was built into the city itself.<\/p>\n
syracuse is one of about 770 cities in the united states with a combined sewer system (css), project coordinator madison quinn told planet forward. this means that the storm sewer and sanitary sewer systems combine underground. wastewater from homes and businesses mixes with rainwater, and it\u2019s all treated together. this design, now outdated, was typical of the time when syracuse\u2019s infrastructure was installed, and its inherent drawbacks plague many cities today.<\/p>\n
\u201con a dry day, we have more than enough capacity to carry everything in the sewer, but when you have a sudden inflow of storm water, you really can overwhelm the system,\u201d quinn said.<\/p>\n
during this sort of event, called a combined sewer overflow (cso), the css is designed to spill the excess untreated water into local waterways that lead to the lake. the continual pollution from this type of overflow led to a 1989 federal consent judgment mandating that onondaga county upgrade its water treatment plant and prevent csos from occurring.<\/p>\n
mahoney entered office in 2008 on the platform that there was a better way to solve the cso problem than the one that had been proposed. she halted construction of three water treatment plants and took the case back to court. the result was an amended consent judgment, and, in 2009, the official birth of save the rain.<\/p>\n
traditional methods for water treatment typically consist solely of \u201cgray\u201d infrastructure: treatment plants, pipes, pumps, and the like. save the rain takes a different approach, combining smaller improvements on gray infrastructure with a variety of \u201cgreen\u201d infrastructure projects, such as rain gardens and green roofs, which capture rainfall during storms and prevent it from going into the sewers to begin with.<\/p>\n
\u201cit\u2019s really about holding the water during the storm, and not releasing it into the sewer during that heavy flow period,\u201d quinn said.<\/p>\n
this is the key to preventing overflow events.<\/p>\n
the 189 green infrastructure projects save the rain has completed to date capture 96.2% of cso volume \u2014 far ahead of its mandated goal of 95% capture by 2018 \u2014 and reduce total runoff by 123 million gallons every year.<\/p>\n
save the rain isn\u2019t just a new, greener strategy \u2014 it has proven cheaper and more practical to implement than alternative gray infrastructure.<\/p>\n
in quinn\u2019s words: \u201cit\u2019s a misconception when people say you can be either environmentally friendly or cost effective.\u201d<\/p>\n
halting the construction of the three proposed treatment plants and instead implementing numerous green infrastructure projects has saved the county an estimated $20 million in capital alone, she said.<\/p>\n
not only that, green infrastructure takes significantly less money and energy to maintain than gray infrastructure. it relies much more heavily on passive, gravity-powered processes and less active pumping. according to a 2014 analysis by the county\u2019s green program manager, save the rain saves the county $225,000 in maintenance costs each year, and 51,510 kwh of energy.<\/p>\n