as nifty and available as “new” nuclear may be, it will always have
\n“indefinitely radioactive” fuel rods left over, always have potentially
\ncatastrophic meltdown consequences, a “bulls eye” for terrorists, huge
\ncapital investment expense, and at least ten year scheduling and
\nconstruction time (if all environmental and political roadblocks are
\nmanaged).<\/p>\n
(additionally, there is not enough production capacity available in the
\nentire world to build enough new nuclear power plants to replace
\n“fossil fuel” boiler plants, and not enough construction capacity to
\nreplace current nuclear facilities that are already 30 years into
\nservice with 40 year original life time design limits.)<\/p>\n
in contrast, all “nuclear” and “fossil fuel” power plant production
\nfacilities simply need new boiler technology to completely eliminate
\nall “emissions” and all “nuclear” footprint.<\/p>\n
it is ordinary conventional construction technology to replace dirty
\nboiler technology with microwave energy beam (receiving dish) boilers.<\/p>\n
it simply amounts to a new steam pipe hooked up to every existing
\nturbine and generator pouring electricity into every available
\ndistribution grid.<\/p>\n
it is especially economical, because production of replacement
\nturbines, generators and power grid materials will be cheaper after energy beam conversion.<\/p>\n
every manufactured replacement inventory
\nwill cost less by decreased cost of energy to manufactre these materials as fossil fuel and nuclear boilers are
\nreplaced!<\/p>\n
published information indicates that space solar power satellites being
\ndesigned in japan will individually provide power for 500,000 utility
\nhouseholds (each!).<\/p>\n
i live in rochester, new york… our local utility is rochester gas and
\nelectric company… the company serves 200,000 households according to
\npayment clerk when i recently paid my utility bill. metropolitan
\nrochester has 1 million residents within a 20 mile radius of our
\ndowntown “center city”.<\/p>\n
syracuse, new york and buffalo, new york have relatively the same
\nnumber of households, population and density. in my mind… only
\nhaving a bachelors degree in liberal arts (university of
\npittsburgh-english)… i do not think it is unreasonable to recognize
\nthat one “energy beam” satellite designed to serve 500,000 households
\ncould serve either rochester and syracuse, or rochester and at least
\n2\/3s of buffalo ( since it is a little larger than rochester and
\nsyracuse… one satellite can evidently serve 1\/2 of western new york
\nstate.<\/p>\n
on this basis, researching the federal energy information
\nadministration indicates as of 2007 there are 110 million utility
\nhouseholds across the entire united states. (incidentally, taking a
\ncourse communications 141 at monroe community college fall 2009, the
\nnielsen television rating service surveys 110 million “television
\nhouseholds” across america. i’m not a rocket scientist, but it seems
\nreasonable that every household that is a “utility household” according
\nto the government energy information administration just may be a
\n“television household” measured by nielsen.<\/p>\n
when i divide 110,000.000 by 500,000 (using long division with a pencil
\nthe way i was taught before every child had a pocket calculator)… i
\nget 220… err, 220 satellites could provide electricity for every
\nutility household across america replacing every fossil fuel boiler and
\nevery atomic energy boiler that simply boil water into high pressure
\nsteam to turn turbines that power generators producing electricity.<\/p>\n
energy beam dish boiler technology just happens to immediately be “zero
\nemissions” and could be completely available across america in ten
\nyears… the same time necessary to build any “new”after energy beam nuclear facility… if every political and environmental road block falls in
\nline.<\/p>\n
i’ll explain how much it will cost to build and launch new satellites,
\nhow much revenue will be generated by a mere $20.00 a month flat rate
\nfor each household!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
as nifty and available as “new” nuclear may be, it will always have “indefinitely radioactive” fuel rods left over, always have potentially catastrophic meltdown consequences, a “bulls eye” for terrorists, huge capital investment expense, and at least ten year scheduling and construction time (if all environmental and political roadblocks are managed). (additionally, there is not…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8629,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4917],"tags":[179],"storyfest_categories":[],"class_list":["post-14496","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-energy","tag-energy"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n