{"id":27131,"date":"2023-02-03t12:37:39","date_gmt":"2023-02-03t12:37:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dev.planetforward.com\/2023\/02\/03\/michigan-carbon-offsets-success-or-scam\/"},"modified":"2023-02-03t12:37:39","modified_gmt":"2023-02-03t12:37:39","slug":"michigan-carbon-offsets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.getitdoneaz.com\/story\/michigan-carbon-offsets\/","title":{"rendered":"michigan carbon offsets: success or scam?"},"content":{"rendered":"
this story was originally published in great lakes echo<\/a> on october 18th, 2022. <\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n to help reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050, michigan officials have created a 100,000 acre project in the pigeon river country state forest that will sell carbon credits to businesses interested in offsetting emissions.<\/p>\n through such programs, big businesses and corporations can buy credits to offset the impact of their emissions that contribute to global warming. one carbon credit equals 1 metric ton of carbon dioxide emission \u2013 that\u2019s about the weight of a great white shark.<\/p>\n a similar program \u2013 the wolverine-copper country project \u2013 is underway in charlevoix and emmet counties in northern michigan and in keweenaw county in the western u.p. on keweenaw lands, it might cease harvesting altogether to allow trees to capture carbon as they grow, said david price, a forest planning and operations manager at michigan\u2019s department of natural resources.<\/p>\n according to price, the focus in charlevoix and emmet counties is on restoring hardwood forests that have been severely impacted by the emerald ash borer<\/a>, an invasive species of beetle, and beech bark disease<\/a>, caused by another invasive species of insect as well as the subsequent fungal infection that the insect causes.<\/p>\n the programs make up michigan\u2019s big wild forest carbon project. the one in pigeon river country is the first in the nation on state lands, though similar projects in michigan on private lands date back about a decade, price said.<\/p>\n critics call the big wild carbon project a scam.<\/p>\n \u201cit\u2019s not going to reduce carbon emissions or increase sequestration by a single cubic centimeter and the dnr acknowledges that,\u201d said marvin roberson, a forest ecologist with michigan\u2019s chapter of the sierra club.<\/p>\n unless the forest landowner \u2013 in this case, michigan\u2019s department of natural resources \u2013 is cutting harvest levels and increasing reforestation efforts as a result of the payments they receive, the program is meaningless, roberson said.<\/p>\n the dnr\u2019s website<\/a> says the carbon project won\u2019t adversely affect management and timber harvest levels from the forest. this concerns critics because carbon offsets only work if the landowner is doing things to sequester carbon beyond what the forest already does, roberson said.<\/p>\n this concept is called “additionality” and is a requirement for a successful carbon offset project, according to a 2010 report by the ecological society of america<\/a>.<\/p>\n after all, there\u2019s no need to pay for something that would happen anyway.<\/p>\n a better approach is to simply cut emissions, roberson said.<\/p>\n targeting pollution at its source would force responsible businesses to clean up local practices, thus mitigating environmental injustice concerns that carbon offset programs often raise, roberson said.<\/p>\n instead of encouraging greener practices, offset programs allow business as usual in places often populated by marginalized groups of people, according to the sierra club michigan chapter.<\/p>\n price disagrees.<\/p>\n next year, a new forest management plan \u2013 which is revised every decade \u2013 will allow some trees in pigeon river to grow longer and larger through big tree management practices, which offers further sequestration, price said. at minimum, the state will harvest less than is grown.<\/p>\n
\na divisive issue<\/h2>\n
going to the source<\/h2>\n